Kamala is Like Hitler

    Throughout the Biden White House occupation, the Democrats and much of the no-longer mainstream media often threw accusations that were not only wrong, but in fact the exact opposite of true.  The ultimate example, of course, was the Biden "victory" in the 2020 election.  There were many, many more - such as a January "insurrection" that was actually a protest to the Democrat insurrection.

    Today, I heard of yet another Big Lie that I want to devote this blog to debunking.  The no-longer mainstream media and Kamala are claiming that Trump is like Hitler.  They also say he is fascist.  As an avid Objectivist scholar, I have read 165 books promoted by the official Ayn Rand endorsed book catalogs.  Hitler ran for power in a German election.  His party was actually called the national socialist party that was prevalent there.  Now look at Kamala.  She is so socialist that it is more accurate to call her communist.  Her father was a communist professor who followed Karl Marx.  When compared to U.S. Senators, from which she was once a member, she is said to be ideologically left of Bernie Sanders and perhaps left of all Senators in our history.

    Trump is a Businessman.  His mannerisms and charisma may seem hotheaded sometimes.  But, he is ideologically Capitalistic.  Trump sincerely wants Free Markets.  When he sees socialism, his style is to clamp down on that other country until the state gives up the anti-capitalistic practices.  But he desperately wants total Capitalism.

    Kamala on the other hand wants: higher taxes, more inflation, more regulations, more government control over our lives, and a communist America.

    I also heard the accusation that Trump is fascist.  Socialism, communism, and fascism are all really very similar.  They all involve massive economic confiscation and personal government control.  It is not Trump, but Kamala who is a Big Fascist.

    So, you see, the next time you hear a news opinion that Trump is like Hitler, one should edit what you just witnessed with the truth: Kamala is like Hitler.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Why Objectivists Should Vote For Trump

    After developing most of her philosophy, Ayn Rand tried influencing America politically through the politics of an election with the Goldwater campaign.  That Republican candidate lost by a big margin.  Rand then reevaluated her view of Republican politics and took a stand against future support of that party.  The following blog is my own personal philosophy regarding the question: "Should Objectivists vote Republican?".

    I want to start by saying that I am an Objectivist voter.  If I knew of any Objectivist candidates, I would almost certainly vote for them.  However, I have never heard of any running who show up on my ballot; so I am faced with the dilemma: "Do I let a really bad candidate win, or vote for one that I evaluate as not as bad?".  I have heard the topic of Objectivist candidacy brought up by one prominent Objectivist more than once, and the argument is always that it would be impractical because the Objectivist would almost certainly lose.  This may be true at this time.  However, even if the candidate only carried 10% of the vote, it would give us Objectivists someone we really want to vote for.  And, not only that, the Objectivist candidate could use one's campaign as a platform to speak up for Ayn Rand's philosophy.

    So, on November 5th, I won't be voting for Objectivists on my ballot.  Why?  Because there aren't any!  This brings us to the practical argument that either Republicans or Democrats will probably win most of the races.  For the sake of brevity, just consider the Presidency.  According to Objectivism, Donald Trump is not perfect.  But, should I ignore the nature of Kamala Harris just because Ayn Rand would have wanted to hold out for something more?  Harris, whose father was a communist professor, and philosophically is the opposite of almost everything Ayn Rand held dear?

    Personally, I cannot see America become destroyed because prominent Objectivists want to make a point before they try to win the country back.  For this reason, I am going to vote for Donald J. Trump, and encourage all Objectivists to do the same.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Popularity is a Poll

    In the 2024 presidential campaign, former President Trump is cris-crossing the country to give speeches at rallies in different states.  Most of his events draw crowds of tens of thousands of supporters, with many upwards of 40 or 50 thousand.  This last weekend, at his return to Butler County to finish the speech where he had been shot, it was estimated that Trump drew 100,000 people.

    Democrat candidate, Harris, on the other hand, rarely ventures out to give speeches or makes herself available to the press for interviews.  I can only remember one event where Harris had over 2,000 people attending.  And, that was a combined show with a performer where the Democrats coordinated a couple thousand people to be bused in.

    Americans keep hearing about the polls often conducted by the no-longer mainstream media.  They usually claim that Harris and Trump are running about even, and it could go either way.  This is ridiculous!  The American people just need to look at the crowd estimate comparisons between the two candidates to know that Trump is way ahead.  Popularity is a poll - in fact probably the best poll we have.  Americans will vote for who they like.  And, truthfully, very few of us like Kamala Harris.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Harris Victories in "Blue States" Not Predetermined

    The "no-longer mainstream media" likes to report on Trump's progress with his rallies in what they call the "Swing States".  For some reason, those media companies claim that many of the 50 states are destined to go Democrat.  According to them, these so called: "Blue States" are populated by unthinking, Kamala Harris drones.  They assume the Americans who live there do not have free-will, being unable to judge and individually decide for themselves who to vote for.

    I think I understand the Democrat strategy.  When the remnants of the election fraud system kick into play on the night of November 5th, and most of the "Blue States" are called for Harris, few will question the verdict - as those states were expected to go Democrat all along.

    But, in fact, Americans do think, choose, and can change their minds.  So, perhaps the question should not be: "How many 'Swing States' will Trump carry?".  But, instead, "Will Harris win anything at all?".

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter