The White House Declares Censorship

     TeaParty.org has revealed that The White House is declaring censorship in America.  Info Wars reports:

"The White House is ordering insurance companies not to criticize Obamacare and threatening "retribution" against executives who speak out, according to CNN reporter Drew Griffin."

"...Griffin revealed that insurance companies had been told to "keep quiet" about the fact that millions of Americans are being told that they cannot keep their existing policies..."

"Basically, if you speak out, if you are quoted, you're going to get a call from the White House..."

It is interesting that it is the Democrats, in this case, who are censoring Americans.  Traditionally, it has usually been the Republicans who have had more of a disposition towards wanting some suppression of Free Speech.  But, Barack "The Kenyan" Obama is a new mix of the bad side of each.  He stands against economic freedom and personal liberty.

I have been unable to locate the exact quote.  But, what I remember reading in the Objectivist literature is that Ayn Rand advocated fighting against tyranny through peaceful means unless Freedom of Speech is violated.  At that point, physical retaliation against the State is warranted.

Personally, I don't plan to fight back, physically.  However, I think Barack "The Kenyan" Obama and his political gang may want to take into consideration those who do and give up on Obamacare, as well as the rest of the fascist and communist agenda.

Paul Wharton
Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) for being the fuel of my mind

Sebelius doesn't work for those she kills.

     On Friday, Hell Hurling Statism (HHS) official, Sebelius, was quoted as saying, "The majority of people calling for me to resign, I would say, are people who I don't work for and who do not want this program to work in the first place."

Apparently, Obama's next in line scapegoat to take the fall doesn't understand the proper role of officials in government.  An American politician is a public servant who works for the individuals of America, not the other way around.

But, from the view of Sebelius, she now commands American medicine, and the means to heal oneself with a centralized discretion of how to allocate your property.

So, what is the attitude of this all-assuming "authority" over the lives of Americans?  The Rush Limbaugh Show and Sean Hannity have a telling sound bite of Sebelius that reads, "Some people live.  Some people die."

Thus, each of us who Sebelius doesn't work for, who opposes her, may want to try to imagine what will happen to oneself when one wants medical attention for a serious condition, and guess if Hell Hurling Statism (HHS) will favor one to live or die.  I think the title of this post answers the question.

Paul Wharton
Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) for being the fuel of my mind

Obamacare Violates the Right to One's Own Life

     When a Democrat tries to justify Obamacare--whether it is Obama, Sebelius or anyone else--the argument always comes down to something like this:

If you step out into the street and are hit by a bus, suffer a heart attack, or get cancer, you will want to go to a hospital for treatment.

I object to this assertion, because, you see, if I require more free market medicine to live than I can afford, I will choose to die.

The Democrats view my attitude offensively.  They insist that I don't have the Right to My Own Life, which includes the Right to End My Own Life.  In one of those classic medical tragedies mentioned above, the Democrats insist upon the authority to take over my life--forcing me to live in tortured pain until the call comes from Washington, via death panel, to turn off the medical faucet.

But, in an America without Obamacare--one that is truly an environment of Capitalist Medicine--every dollar would go further.  Not only would one be able to make more money to pay doctors and spend on medical products, the free market would steadily drive costs down.

In a Capitalist Medicine America, if I was hit by a bus, suffered a heart attack, or got cancer, I might be able to afford to pay doctors and hospitals, and thus want to live.

So, it is Obama, Sebelius and the rest of the Democrats who vote for continued Obamacare who are the killers in America.  They seek to not only balloon an environment of Communist Health Care, but, by its nature, it will take down all remnants of Capitalist Medicine that we still have, today.

Paul Wharton
Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) for being the fuel of my mind

Reconciling "The National Debt"

     With the Chinese credit rating downgrade, and the raising of the debt ceiling by Congress, I think that it is time to analyze the entire concept of "The National Debt" to figure out what exactly the U.S. government is doing, and decide if it is where Americans want to go.

I have several questions concerning what is referred to as "The National Debt":

(1) What individuals receive the borrowed money to spend?
(2) What individuals will be forced to pay the spent money back (plus interest)?
(3) Will Americans renege or revolt to paying back the money spent by others?
(4) If Americans do default, will China declare war on us?
(5) Is the further increasing of "The National Debt", in essence, delivering Americans into long-term servitude to China?

Some politicians are often fond of relating a political national debt to an economic credit card.  But, if you analyze the two, you can identify that the political "credit card" is controlled by government; and only the political leaders and their friends get to choose how to spend it--while those who are not favored by Washington are forced to pick up the tab.  Further, it becomes an ever increasing, private, financial burden every time the limit is extended.  On the other hand, an economic credit card is under the owner's personal control.  If the individual spends oneself into debt, then what is owed back is not a result of the unwanted spending of others.  If debt is incurred, the individual pays for the consequences of one's own actions.

Paul Wharton
Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) for being the fuel of my mind

The Mainstream Media Caved

     Right now, in the mainstream media, one of the major talking points that has been sent out to the government subsidized, propaganda networks is that the Republicans have "caved".

But, what about the mainstream media?  Aren't they responsible for reporting, and, in the case of admittedly biased shows, covering and advocating for what are stories that tell of what is good in America and the world?

Is it really the Republicans--who gave it a shot, and so far did hold out for fifteen days--who have caved on America?  Or, is it the mainstream media who has caved by selling out this great country in which we all live?

Paul Wharton
Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) for being the fuel of my mind

Wrecking an Economy Over a Number

     The way things stand now, in America, the U.S. government has an unlimited power to print money--thus inflating everyone's dollars so they are worth less.  The crucial question in the current political-economy is not will the Fed inflate, but can the Fed inflate.  In my view, if government is even given the ability to print more money, then our dollars are lost.

Hundreds of years ago, there weren't digital mainframes that managed numbers in the American economy.  To inflate, money had to actually be printed on a printing press.  But, the way things are now, all the government has to do is type up a number in the trillions on a keyboard, and send it into the economy.  What kind of unlimited power is that?

Obama has fundamentally wrecked the American economy far worse than most of us know.  The mainstream media keeps pointing to the DOW and NASDAQ averages of the biggest companies, while the government types up numbers and sends them to their friends to keep these numbers afloat.  The strength of the U.S. economy is an artificial illusion.  Obama's plan, when its value crashes, is to find some good guys to try to blame in his attempt to set up a repeat of the same disaster that inflation and other types of government controls in economics have been wrecking throughout the centuries.

Paul Wharton
Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) for being the fuel of my mind

Exercising a Right Does Not Have Negative Government Consequences

     On The Daily Show, Sebelius, the Witch of Hell Hurling Statism (HHS), was asked why it was that individuals can't say that they don't want Government Health Care.  Sebelius replied:

"Well they can.  They pay a fine.  They pay a fine at the end of the year.  But, they don't have to...I mean they can say I don't want to do it."

In other words, an individual has the "right" to refuse Government Health Care, but Sebelius will make you pay.

This reminds me of numerous experiences in my own life, where I was offered mind-altering drugs, and upon asking the question, "Can I refuse?", I was told loudly and with no conscience, "Yes.  You can refuse.".  However, nearly every time, I was approached by nurses with big security goons later in the night to inject me.

What Sebelius needs to be told is that Americans have Inalienable Individual Rights, and exercising those Rights cannot have negative government consequences.

Paul Wharton
Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) for being the fuel of my mind

Why the FDA is the Biggest Threat to the Basic American Economy

     When The Obama Economy goes into its second dip, many Americans are only going to have the money to purchase their basic needs.  That means food to be alive, and medicine to stay alive.  The FDA represses, not just one of these, but both the sale of food and medicine.  It increases prices and bans potential products--even to the extent of telling you that you cannot buy an otherwise life-saving drug.

It is my hope that the FDA will be eliminated, with nothing put in its place, before Obama's Second Crash occurs.  Only then will the trade of the most valuable products that Americans produce and exchange, in order to survive and eventually prosper once again, be able to be legally exercised.

Paul Wharton
Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) for being the fuel of my mind

Shut Down Government Subsidies to Mainstream Media

     I don't know exactly what has been going on that transformed the mainstream media from a semi-unbiased industry to the totally pro-Obama entity it is today.  However, I think I can identify what it was, inductively.

The Federal Reserve has been creating money and giving it to those it chooses.  With the debt ceiling repetitively expanding, that has been another cash source for Obama to play around with.  If you consider that most of the few people who watch the mainstream media "news" shows, or buy their papers, are non-productive, with little spending power to make the advertising pay off, then that shows that there is something going on to sustain the "businesses".

The House of Representatives holds the initiation of the "power of the purse".  They decide what in a government gets funded.  The outrageous assertion that some previous legislation in U.S. history was passed that gave a President the ability to pick and choose "essential government" to fund in the event of a Congressional "shutdown" is contrary to the fundamental power of the House.  Therefore, the House of Representatives can, and should, revoke the subsidies to American media businesses.

Paul Wharton
Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) for being the fuel of my mind

An Ethic of Avoiding Socialism

     As I write this blog, it is the morning of October 2nd, 2013.  Political history will show that the U.S. government went into a partial shutdown at the beginning of the month.  The media has been documenting hardship and catastrophes, but in my life, yesterday was just a normal (though more profitable) day.  How can this be when a government that has been so intricately woven into our lives is rendered dysfunctional?

My answer to the above question is simple.  I go to great lengths to exercise a personally adopted ethic of avoiding socialism.  This is not necessarily in accordance with the official Objectivist philosophy--which sometimes advocates collecting back what was taken despite the fact that it was placed in a kind of homogeneous pool of "state property".  My view is that when that is done, the property is lost.

So, how do I implement my philosophy of "avoiding socialism"?  It is simple: don't go to socialized places, don't make socialized choices despite the cost, and when there is too much difficulty, try to minimize the use of socialized "stuff".

For example, I live about two blocks from a train station.  There is a heavily utilized government passenger train system that goes to different towns and into Chicago.  In the 15+ years I have lived here, I have never once set foot upon one of those trains.

To give another example of my determination, mailing a regular letter as a UPS parcel costs more than 20 times as much as the stamp that one uses to send it through government.  I definitely need to improve my integrity, in this case, but I can remember at least ten times being so upset at the State that I mailed a protest letter, privately, despite the cost.

Finally, I'd like to share the ultimate defiance that one can do to avoid socialism--though the outcome may explain why I am not usually going to this extreme.  Many years ago, I decided that I had had it with socialism, so would completely avoid everything with even a hint of government being where it didn't belong.  I quit my job, bought a lot of food and drink, and camped out in my room.  I figured that since the roads and sidewalks are socialized, I was living the best life I could.  I unplugged everything electrical because they were public utilities, and disconnected my phone.  Well, my family became alarmed, and, in the end, the State put me in a mental hospital.  I guess I was too much of a threat to their concept of how government functions.

Now, I am not asking Americans to go to the extreme that I did in this last example.  But, if you can just identify several non-socialized alternatives to how you have been conducting your life, and eliminate completely your participation in easily avoidable socialism, it can go a long way towards advancing the cause of Capitalism.

Pay your bills electronically.  Don't send big packages through the USPS.  Buy bottled water.  Don't take classes at a government school.  Purchase an exercise bike so you don't have to jog down the street.  Avoid public parks and zoos.  Don't go to the local library.  Etc...

And, finally, I'd like to emphasize the crowning achievement of this cause if any of it still remains after the shutdown--Avoid Obamacare!

Paul Wharton
Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) for being the fuel of my mind